Antidepressants in People With Chronic Liver Disease and Depression: When Are They Warranted and How to Choose the Suitable One?

Most chronic medical illnesses are associated with significant psychiatric comorbidity, especially in the form of depression, anxiety, and suicidality. Chronic liver disease (CLD) is no exception to this and rather is placed uniquely as compared to other diseases because of its intersection with alcohol use disorder and other substance use, which in itself is a mental illness. Patients with CLD may have comorbid psychiatric illnesses; the pharmacokinetic concerns arising out of hepatic dysfunction which affects pharmacotherapy for depression and vice versa. The high prevalence of medical comorbidities with CLD may further complicate the course and outcome of depression in such patients, and diagnostic and management issues arise from special situations like transplant evaluation, alcohol use disorder, and hepatic encephalopathy or multifactorial encephalopathy seen in a disoriented or agitated patient with CLD. For this narrative review, we carried out a literature search in PubMed/PubMed Central and in Google Scholar (1980-2023) with the keywords "depression in cirrhosis", "antidepressants in liver disease", "anxiety in liver disease", "depression in liver transplantation", and "drug interactions with antidepressants". This review presents a comprehensive view of the available research on the use of antidepressants in patients with CLD, including deciding to use them, choosing the right antidepressant, risks, drug interactions, and adverse reactions to expect, and managing the same. In addition, liver transplant fitness and the overlap of hepatic encephalopathy with neuropsychiatric illness will be discussed.

Dropout rates and reasons for dropout among patients receiving clozapine.

Background and Aim: The present study aimed to assess the treatment dropout rates, reasons for treatment dropout, and clozapine discontinuation rate among patients attending a tertiary care center in North India. Materials and Methods: Clozapine data bank was used to identify patients on clozapine, and their treatment records were reviewed for the period Jan 2020-March 2020. Patients who did not follow-up at least once in the last 6 months were considered to have dropped out and were contacted telephonically to understand the reasons for dropout. Treatment records of those following up regularly were reviewed to check if clozapine was discontinued and if so, the reason for the same was evaluated. Results: Out of 671 patients on clozapine, 495 (73.8%) were still on regular follow-up and the remaining 176 (26.2%) had dropped out of treatment. Out of the 176 patients who had dropped out of treatment, 84 could be contacted. Common reasons for dropout were long distance from the hospital (n = 27), long waiting time for consultation (n = 8), no benefit with treatment (n = 17), side effects with medication (n = 10), moving away to another place (n = 6), refusal by the patient to follow-up (n = 7), patient improved and so did not feel the need to continue treatment (n = 7), and other reasons (n = 37). Conclusion: About one-fourth of patients who had started treatment with clozapine dropped out from the treatment. The most common reasons for dropout from treatment included long distance from the hospital and no benefit from treatment.

Fatigue, perceived stigma, self-reported cognitive deficits and psychological morbidity in patients recovered from COVID-19 infection.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have highlighted multiple psychosocial and physical outcomes in patients with COVID-19 infection after recovery. However, the data from developing countries is limited. AIM: To evaluate psychological morbidity, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), fatigue, and perceived stigma among patients with COVID-19 after recovery from the acute phase of COVID-19 infection. METHODS: In a cross-sectional online survey, 206 adult patients (age>18 years), recovered from COVID-19 infection completed the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4), the Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), 4 items self-designed questionnaire evaluating cognitive deficits and self-designed questionnaire to evaluate perceived stigma. Additionally, they completed the information about demographic and clinical information. RESULTS: The prevalence of anxiety, depressive symptoms, and PTSD in the study sample was 24.8 %, 23.8 %, and 30 % respectively. About three-fifths of the participants (61.2 %) had at least one fatigue symptom as per the FSS with the mean FSS score being 32.10 ± 15.28. About one-fourth of the participants (23.7 %) reported "feeling confused and always feeling mentally foggy", and 38 % of patients reported experiencing at least one cognitive problem. The level of felt stigma related to self was seen in 31.1 %, 20 % reported stigma related to family, and 50 % reported stigma in relation to neighbors and society. Those reporting higher PTSD scores had higher anxiety and depressive scores, reported more fatigue and stigma, and had a higher level of cognitive deficits. A higher fatigue score was also associated with higher anxiety, depression, and cognitive deficits. CONCLUSIONS: Our study reveals that a significant proportion of patients after recovery from COVID-19 experience psychological morbidities, fatigue, cognitive problems, and stigma. Efforts should be made to take care of these issues in routine post-COVID follow-up care.

Disulfiram Ethanol Reaction with Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizer: An Exploratory Study.

AIMS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey to estimate the prevalence and clinical manifestation of disulfiram ethanol reaction (DER) and isopropanol toxicity (IT) in patients with alcohol use disorders, on disulfiram. Alcohol-based hand rub contains either ethanol or isopropanol or both. COVID-19 pandemic has led to wide scale usage of sanitizers. Patients with alcohol use disorders, on disulfiram, might experience disulfiram ethanol like reactions with alcohol-based sanitizers. METHODS: We telephonically contacted 339 patients, prescribed disulfiram between January 2014 and March 2020. The assessment pertained to the last 3 months (i.e. third week of March to third week of June 2020). RESULT: The sample consisted of middle-aged men with a mean 16 years of alcohol dependence. Among the 82 (24%) patients adherent to disulfiram, 42 (12.3%) were using alcohol-based hand rubs. Out of these, a total of eight patients (19%; 95% CI 9-33) had features suggestive of DER; four of whom also had features indicative of IT. Five patients (62.5%) had mild and self-limiting symptoms. Severe systemic reactions were experienced by three (37.5%). Severe reactions were observed with exposure to sanitizers in greater amounts, on moist skin or through inhalation. CONCLUSION: Patients on disulfiram should be advised to use alternate methods of hand hygiene.